Top 5 PCI DSS v4.0.1 Myths Debunked
With the March 2025 deadline for PCI DSS v4.0.1 compliance approaching, misinformation is rampant. Let's separate fact from fiction on the most common myths.

All future-dated requirements become mandatory on 31 March 2025. Organisations still operating under v3.2.1 assumptions risk non-compliance and potential fines.
Myth 1: "We Can Keep Using Our v3.2.1 Controls"
The Myth
"Version 4.0 is just a refresh—our existing controls will still pass."
The Reality
PCI DSS v4.0.1 introduces 64 new requirements, with 13 immediately mandatory and 51 becoming mandatory in March 2025. Key changes include:
- Targeted risk analysis requirements for control frequencies
- Enhanced authentication requirements including MFA expansion
- New e-commerce and payment page protections
- Strengthened encryption and key management requirements
- Expanded security awareness training requirements
Myth 2: "The Customised Approach Means Easier Compliance"
The Myth
"The customised approach lets us avoid difficult requirements."
The Reality
The customised approach requires more rigorous documentation, not less. You must:
- Demonstrate how your alternative control meets the security objective
- Prove equal or greater effectiveness than the defined approach
- Document detailed testing procedures and results
- Undergo more intensive QSA scrutiny
- Maintain comprehensive evidence of control effectiveness
The customised approach is designed for mature organisations with sophisticated security programmes, not as an escape route from difficult requirements.
Myth 3: "Multi-Factor Authentication Is Only for Remote Access"
The Myth
"MFA requirements haven't really changed from v3.2.1."
The Reality
Requirement 8.4.2 now mandates MFA for ALL access into the cardholder data environment, not just remote access. This includes:
- Console access from within the network
- Local network access to CDE systems
- Third-party and vendor connections
- Administrative access regardless of location
The scope expansion is significant and requires infrastructure changes for many organisations.
Myth 4: "Targeted Risk Analysis Is Just Documentation"
The Myth
"We just need to document why we chose certain frequencies."
The Reality
Targeted risk analysis (Requirement 12.3.1) requires a documented methodology that:
- Considers threat likelihood and vulnerability severity
- Evaluates asset criticality and business impact
- Is performed by qualified personnel with risk expertise
- Is reviewed at least annually
- Is updated when the environment changes significantly
- Justifies the chosen frequency with evidence-based rationale
This is a rigorous process requiring genuine risk assessment, not a checkbox exercise.
Myth 5: "Service Providers Handle Our Compliance"
The Myth
"Our payment processor is PCI compliant, so we're covered."
The Reality
v4.0.1 strengthens third-party oversight requirements significantly:
- Document which requirements each service provider meets
- Obtain annual compliance confirmation (AOC or attestation)
- Monitor service provider compliance status continuously
- Requirement 12.8 mandates written agreements specifying responsibilities
- You remain responsible for requirements not covered by service providers
With March 2025 approaching, organisations should already be implementing future-dated requirements. Starting now leaves minimal margin for remediation and testing.
What You Should Do Now
- Gap Assessment: Compare current controls against v4.0.1 requirements
- Prioritise Future-Dated Requirements: Focus on the 51 requirements becoming mandatory
- Review MFA Scope: Identify all CDE access points requiring MFA
- Develop Risk Analysis Methodology: Create documented processes for targeted risk analysis
- Update Service Provider Agreements: Ensure contracts reflect v4.0.1 requirements
- Engage Your QSA Early: Discuss your transition approach and timeline
Conclusion
PCI DSS v4.0.1 represents a significant evolution in payment security requirements. Don't let myths derail your compliance programme. Understand the actual requirements, plan appropriately, and engage qualified assessors early to validate your approach.
Share this article